Category: Game

Episodic series promises plenty of Bruce to go with your Bats At a panel at SxSW Gaming today, Telltale Games discussed its work on the upcoming Batman series titled, simply, Batman: A Telltale Games Series. Most notably, Telltale’s Job Stauffer revealed the rough release window for the game. “We’ll be premiering this summer," Stauffer said. But because of the way that Telltale makes its games, "There’s not a lot we can show you until we’re really close to premiering," Stauffer said.
Developing …

Movie was let go one week before release The Little Prince was supposed to open today in theaters across the country, but after Paramount Pictures dropped it from their release schedule last week, the film’s distribution future seemed bleak.
Now, however, it looks like the movie may have found a new home. According to The Hollywood Reporter, Netflix has acquired the distribution rights to the film and will bring it to subscribers. The film was taken over in Canada by eOne and is currently playing in theaters.
Internationally, The Little Prince made $80 million overseas last summer when the film was released in France and was even given the country’s Cesar award for Best Animated Film.
Polygon has reached out to comment from Paramount about why it decided not to release the movie seven days before release. There’s currently no word on when the movie will be available on Netflix.

Console life cycles could be getting shorter Sony is working on a “PlayStation 4.5," a more powerful version of the PlayStation 4 that will be able to play games at 4K resolution, according to a report from Kotaku.
Kotaku cited multiple "developers who have spoken with Sony" about the purported console. Those sources indicated that the "PS4.5" — no word on whether that’s the official name — will include improved graphics hardware to power 4K games, and additional processing power for PlayStation VR, the virtual reality headset that Sony is releasing in October.
There are no indications of a release window or price for the "PS4.5," although one of Kotaku’s sources told the publication that such a device might not be released this year. Sony currently sells the PS4 for $349.99, having dropped the price of the console in October from $399.99, which is what it cost when it launched in November 2013. PlayStation VR will cost $399, although that does not cover the required PlayStation Camera accessory.
The PS4 cannot currently output 4K content, and its optical drive cannot read 4K Blu-ray discs. Masayasu Ito, executive vice president at Sony Computer Entertainment, said in an interview with 4Gamer in October (via Siliconera) that Sony was considering an enhanced PS4 that could support 4K Blu-ray discs. Neil Hunt, Netflix’s chief product officer, told Huffington Post UK in January that Sony had "promised" Netflix that a new revision of the PS4 hardware with 4K support was coming. And Netflix told Forbes in February that it expected hardware refreshes this fall from both Sony and Microsoft with 4K video playback for the PS4 and Xbox One, respectively.

Must Read

Phil Spencer signals Xbox One hardware upgrades

If Sony is indeed considering a mid-cycle hardware upgrade, the company may not be alone. During a presentation to the media last month, Xbox head Phil Spencer posited a future in which Microsoft will "come out with new hardware capability during a generation."
Spencer contrasted the typical console life cycle with that of computers, smartphones and tablets, telling Polygon that the latter category of hardware offers "a very continuous evolution cycle in hardware, whereas between console generations most of the evolution is making it cheaper and potentially making it smaller." He also noted that PCs and mobile devices gradually get more and more powerful without locking out existing software like new gaming platforms usually do.
In particular, Spencer highlighted PlayStation VR as an example of Sony adding a new feature to the PS4 — virtual reality — without "changing what the core console is about," suggesting that Microsoft would want to do something similar, but in a way that would deliver better-playing games. Spencer later noted in an appearance on Major Nelson’s podcast that he wasn’t saying Microsoft would allow Xbox owners to open up their console and upgrade the parts. Instead, said Spencer, his comments were meant as a "longer-term vision statement."
We’ve reached out to Sony for comment, and will update this article with any information we receive.

This bundle gives you everything you need Sony announced that the PlayStation VR platform would cost $399 and launch this October during the 2016 Game Developer’s Conference, but the company left out the fact that the system requires the $60 PlayStation 4 camera to function. While it may be true that many players already own the camera, the fact it’s mandatory does add a bit to the price discussion.
Sony has now announced that it will be selling a bundle that has every piece of hardware you need, or could want, for playing virtual reality games on the PlayStation 4. The bundle will sell for $499.99 in the US or $599.99 in Canada, and comes with the following:

All contents of the PS VR core bundle:
PS VR headset
PS VR cables Stereo
Headphones
PlayStation VR Demo Disc
PlayStation Camera 2
PlayStation Move motion controllers
PlayStation VR Worlds (disc)

“Starting at 7:00 a.m. PT on Tuesday, March 22nd, pre-orders will open for the PlayStation VR Launch Bundle at participating retailers," the official blog post states.
If you wanted to know the price of everything you will need or could want to play all existing virtual reality experiences, this is the bundle for you. You also certainly get your money’s worth with the three extra pieces of hardware and the PlayStation VR Worlds experiences.

“I know we disappointed many people" A Microsoft Xbox-hosted party during the 2016 Game Developers Conference last night featured women dancing on platforms, rightfully angering many attendees — both men and women — and reminding many in the industry that even an often progressive company like Microsoft can contribute to the video game industry’s long history of sexual objectification of women at professional events.
What makes this situation all the more jarring is that it took place the very same day as Microsoft’s well-received 16th annual (!) Women in Gaming Luncheon. Phil Spencer, the head of Xbox, sent an email to the entire Xbox team, and published it on the Xbox Wire blog, taking responsibility for the event and calling it "unequivocally wrong." Here’s Spencer’s letter in full:

How we show up as an organization is incredibly important to me. We want to build and reflect the culture of team Xbox – internally and externally – a culture that each one of us can represent with pride. An inclusive culture has a direct impact on the products and services we deliver and the perception consumers have of the Xbox brand and our company, as a whole.
It has come to my attention that at Xbox-hosted events at GDC this past week, we represented Xbox and Microsoft in a way that was absolutely not consistent or aligned to our values. That was unequivocally wrong and will not be tolerated. This matter is being handled internally, but let me be very clear – how we represent ourselves as individuals, who we hire and partner with and how we engage with others is a direct reflection of our brand and what we stand for. When we do the opposite, and create an environment that alienates or offends any group, we justly deserve the criticism.
It’s unfortunate that such events could take place in a week where we worked so hard to engage the many different gaming communities in the exact opposite way. I am personally committed to ensuring that diversity and inclusion is central to our everyday business and our core values as a team – inside and outside the company. We need to hold ourselves to higher standards and we will do better in the future.

In a separate comment emailed to Polygon, Spencer repeated some of this message, and acknowledged, "I know we disappointed many people."

At Xbox-hosted events at GDC this past week, we represented Xbox and Microsoft in a way that was not consistent or aligned to our values. It was unequivocally wrong and will not be tolerated. I know we disappointed many people and I’m personally committed to holding ourselves to higher standards. We must ensure that diversity and inclusion are central to our everyday business and core values. We will do better in the future.

Aaron Greenberg, head of games marketing for Xbox, said on Twitter that he was "very disappointed" to see images of the dancers.

@ZenMobius @XboxP3 @Xbox @Microsoft @Spacekatgal @GDC Very disappointed to see this, going to follow up with team.
— Aaron Greenberg (@aarongreenberg) March 18, 2016

The event — clearly branded as a Microsoft-hosted party in the invitation obtained by Polygon below — took place at 1015 Folsom, a nightclub located about a half mile from GDC, from 9 p.m. to 1 a.m. PT. Attendees picked up their passes from Microsoft’s Business Suite in the Moscone Center complex where GDC takes place, leaving little question as to the official sanction of the software and gaming giant in the proceedings.

The image below from an attendee offers a glimpse of the party’s atmosphere, and of the scantily clad dancers performing there.

Great fun at the Microsoft Xbox party with a million geeks! #gamedev #gdc #gdcplay #sanfrancisco
A photo posted by Henning Ludvigsen (@henningludvigsen) on Mar 17, 2016 at 11:29pm PDT

Three years ago, the International Game Developers Association found itself in a similar situation in which scantily clad female dancers were hired to perform at a GDC party. The event prompted members, including designer Brenda Romero — then co-chair of the IGDA Women in Games special interest group — to resign from the organization.

It’s fighting time Legendary Pictures reportedly hosted a surprise screening of Duncan Jones’ Warcraft film this past week in Los Angeles, but for those that couldn’t attend, the studio has also released a new teaser.
The teaser features Travis Fimmel’s Sir Anduin Lothar, a knight for the Kingdom of Azeroth better known as the Lion of Azeroth, taking on a giant orc. They’re in the middle of what appears to be a desert, with skulls and other various bones scattered among them.
The video focuses pretty heavily on the various characters — both in Lothar’s army of human soldiers and a gang of orcs — as they prepare for war. There are some shots of the different lands World of Warcraft fans will be familiar with, too.
Jones’ movie will follow the orc and human races, once bitter enemies, as they come together to take on a new and bigger threat. Although there are issues within both armies over the newfound comradeship, it’s evident this is the only option the orcs have after being forced to move away from the land they called home.
Warcraft, which stars Fimmel alongside Toby Kebbell, Paula Patton, Ben Foster and Dominic Cooper, hits theaters June 10.

Time to upgrade to an Xbox One ESPN and Microsoft are retiring the Xbox 360’s ESPN app on March 23, according to a notice posted in the app.
Microsoft confirmed the ESPN app’s shutdown to Polygon in a statement that is essentially identical to the message in the app, which was first reported by Deadspin. The app debuted in November 2010, offering content such as live sporting events and personalized scores and highlights. Two years later, Microsoft and ESPN added live programming from all ESPN networks, including shows such as SportsCenter.
The shutdown applies only to the Xbox 360; the Xbox One’s ESPN app will continue to operate, and Microsoft noted as much in its statement, directing users to “check out ESPN on Xbox One for everything you love about ESPN on Xbox 360."

Asked for additional details on the closure of the Xbox 360 app, an ESPN spokesperson declined further comment. But an ESPN source indicated to Polygon that usage of the ESPN app on Xbox 360 has been dropping since the launch of the Xbox One in November 2013. The Xbox 360 itself is well over 11 years old, having debuted in November 2005.
ESPN remains accessible on external devices including computers, tablets and streaming set-top boxes through the WatchESPN app. However, the Xbox One is now the only video game console that offers an ESPN app.

Guns don’t kill people. The Punisher kills people A few episodes into the second season of Daredevil, the eponymous hero and his opponent — Frank Castle, the Punisher — finally talk out their differences. Well, it’s more like they yell their differences at each other in gravelly voices. One of them is a man who takes the law into his own hands to make sure criminals face the legal repercussions of their actions. The other is a man who takes the law into his own hands to viciously murder criminals with large guns.
“You’re both wrong!" I yelled at the screen. "I mean — Daredevil’s right! But his argument SUCKS!"
I credit superheroes with my opposition to the death penalty; it could be a side-effect of 20 years of Batman fandom. But that also creates a high rhetorical bar: It’s one thing when you have to defend a character refusing to kill the Kingpin, Green Goblin, General Zod or whatever.
Come back to me when you have to defend not killing the Joker.
Meta-textually, there are two simple reasons why superheroes don’t kill:

At his inception, Batman used guns and spouted one-liners like "Death to Doctor Death!" He and Superman were editorially mandated into non-lethal heroes a year or two into their existence, once it became clear that the nascent superhero genre was so popular with children that parents were starting to take notice. Historically, American comics have needed a fig leaf to show that publishers weren’t feeding reprehensible garbage to children. There were congressional hearings at the height of the McCarthy Era that examined a proposed link between comic books and juvenile delinquency. There were literal book burnings.
Editorially, publishers of indefinitely long serial stories need characters to stay around so that they can be used again. Readers like the familiarity, marketing likes the brand stability and writers and artists on a grueling monthly schedule like that they have a well of established characters and character designs to pull from. The "never kill" mandate lowers stakes, but it makes sense. Comics exist in the same sort of continuum as sitcoms (and Greek and Shakespearean comedies): Regardless of the crazy events of the story, ultimately the status quo must be maintained.

But if you’re asking "why don’t superheroes kill," those aren’t the answers you want. You want the in-universe reason, even if the external realities of the comics industry created the question in the first place. You’re not wrong. The best stories have understandable internal logic for the facts of their setting, whether or not those facts were mandated upon creators by whatever sort of outside constraints.
Unfortunately there are still a lot of half-assed attempts to write a superhero who explains why they don’t kill. I’m a Batman fan, and "Because we can’t cross that line," from a character who is routinely depicted as maiming criminals or torturing them for information becomes ludicrous. "Because it makes us like them," from a guy who repeatedly puts mass-murderers into a system that cannot hold them is dumb. "Because all people deserve a second chance." Seriously, dude, the Joker is on his, like, 400th chance.
"Because we don’t." Holy tautology, Batman! It’s not that I think Batman should kill the Joker. I don’t think he should kill anybody, ever. I just wish writers were better at articulating why.
Here’s the good reason why superheroes don’t kill
Whether or not they know how to say it, superheroes don’t kill because they believe the system needs help, but isn’t irreparably broken.
We know this for two reasons: one, they talk about it so dang much. Fixing Gotham. Saving Hell’s Kitchen.
And two: If they didn’t believe the system was ultimately fixable and desirable, they wouldn’t be punching criminals and corrupt officials while befriending the good cops and lawyers.

They’d be tearing that system down. They’d be Nolan’s Two-Face, Moore’s V, they’d be Ra’s al Ghul or Magneto. They’d be the Punisher.
Editorially, Batman is never going to fix Gotham, he’s never going to retire (except in stories where he lives long enough to become physically incapable of being Batman) and he’s never going to stop being needed. But textually, the vast majority of superheroes are trying to create a world in which they are not needed.
The characters who have formed our most standard superhero tropes are characters who ultimately believe in the system while acknowledging that it’s broken. By definition, a vigilante works outside the law — but at the end of the day (or, maybe, at the beginning of business hours), Matt Murdock is still a defense attorney. Bruce Wayne still uses the power of his wealth and influence to support political candidates and outreach programs. Clark Kent and Peter Parker still spend their days working in investigative journalism.
Which brings us to the Punisher. Like Batman, he’s motivated by direct personal tragedy, but unlike Batman (most of the time), the men that destroyed his family are alive, known and active criminals. Like Daredevil, Frank Castle looking to clean up the streets of Hell’s Kitchen. But unlike Matt Murdock, Bruce Wayne or Clark Kent, Frank doesn’t have the skills, influence or education needed to interact with the legal system in any substantive way. Instead, he’s just very, very good at killing people, and very, very motivated to do so. That doesn’t make him right. It just gives him the internally consistent motivation of being a lot less likely to feel like the criminal justice system is worth a damn.
If you kill criminals instead of assisting the proper authorities in apprehending them, you are replacing the criminal justice system. If nothing else, it’s clear that defense attorney Matt Murdock believes that due process should be respected. You’d think a lawyer would be able to present a more eloquent argument for that than a screaming match with the Punisher.

Open source software can save games, whether Nintendo likes it or not Frank Cifaldi, head of restoration at developer Digital Eclipse, took to the stage at this week’s Game Developers Conference for an hour-long talk about game preservation. Emulation — a software process by which programmers are able to make one computer pretend to be an entirely different kind of computer — is the best solution for keeping games in print, Cifaldi said.
But the clock is ticking. Games are being lost right now, and something needs to be done about it if the video game industry is to avoid the same fate as the film industry.
“According to the Film Foundation, over half the films made before 1950 are gone," Cifaldi said. "I don’t mean that you can’t buy these on DVD. I mean they’re gone. They don’t exist anymore." For films produced before 1920, Cifaldi said, that number jumps to 80 percent.

Must Read

The future of games history is workplace theft

"That terrified me. I wasn’t particularly a film buff, but the idea of these works just disappearing forever and never being recoverable scared the crap out of me. So I started wondering is anyone doing this for games. Is anyone making sure that video games aren’t doing the same stupid shit that film did to make their heritage disappear?
"And yeah, there were people doing this. We didn’t call them archivists. We didn’t call them digital archeologists or anything. We called them software pirates."
It’s emulation’s long association with piracy, Cifaldi said, that has given it a bad name. Nintendo in particular seems to have a particular aversion towards it, he noted, pointing to their official statement on the issue which has been available at their corporate website for the last 16 years.

How Come Nintendo Does Not Take Steps Towards Legitimizing Nintendo Emulators?
Emulators developed to play illegally copied Nintendo software promote piracy. That’s like asking why doesn’t Nintendo legitimize piracy. It doesn’t make any business sense. It’s that simple and not open to debate.

But this language, Cifaldi claims, is disingenuous because the Wii U’s Virtual Console is nothing more than an emulator.
More damning, Cifaldi claims to have found a piece of hexadecimal code from a freely available Nintendo Entertainment System emulator — a kind of watermark from a Nintendo emulator known as iNES — embedded within the code of the version of Super Mario Bros. for sale on the Virtual Console right now.
"I would posit," Cifaldi said, "that Nintendo downloaded Super Mario Bros. from the internet and sold it to you."

Polygon reached out to Nintendo for comment on that accusation, to which they responded emphatically; "Nintendo is not using ROMs downloaded from the internet."
Regardless of Nintendo’s stance on emulation, Cifaldi said that the easiest, the most accurate and the most non-destructive way forward for digital games preservation was to use emulators such as Multiple Arcade Machine Emulator and Multi Emulator Super System, colloquially known as MAME and MESS respectively.
Cifaldi argued that if GOG.com can use a modified version of DOSBox to sell classic PC games, why can’t some company use MAME and MESS to package and sell classic arcade and console games? It’s easier now than ever since, on March 4 of this year, MAME and MESS went open source under the same license as DOXBox, meaning that for the first time those emulators can be used commercially for free.
"I’m not saying MAME and MESS are perfect," Cifaldi said, but since the code is open source volunteers can easily contribute to making it better. His own company, which recently ported Mega Man to modern platforms, is playing with the technology, and may use it in a commercial release before long, but the code is out there for anyone.
"We’re just a single studio," Cifaldi said. "I can imagine someone like an Amazon forking MAME, bringing it in house, bringing it up to snuff and bringing games back."

Yes, even the upcoming Quantum Break bundle Microsoft is bringing back its annual Spring Sale with deals on Xbox One consoles and games, headlined by a $50 discount on all Xbox One bundles, Xbox director of programming Larry Hryb announced today.
The console discount drops the price of the Tom Clancy’s The Division 1 TB bundle from $399 to $349 and the 500 GB Name Your Game bundle from $349 to $299. It also applies to the upcoming Special Edition Quantum Break bundle, which regularly costs $349 and includes a 500 GB console and controller in “cirrus white," even though the package won’t be released until the week after the Spring Sale ends.
All pre-orders of Quantum Break come with Alan Wake, and the bundle is one of the purchases that will also net buyers a free Windows 10 copy of Quantum Break.

The bundle discounts will go live when the Spring Sale begins Sunday, March 20. Then, on Tuesday, March 22, the Xbox Store will offer more than 150 deals on digital games, PC games, movies and TV shows. The discounts will cut prices by 40-60 percent, and will be available on titles such as Fallout 4, Halo 5: Guardians, Far Cry Primal and Rainbow 6 Siege. The Xbox Store will also have deals on backward-compatible Xbox 360 games like Fallout 3 and Just Cause 2.
This isn’t just an Xbox sale — it’s a Microsoft sale. The company is offering discounts on all kinds of products, including Surface devices and computer accessories, at the Microsoft Store. The Spring Sale ends March 28.